Frequently Searched Expressions for Mark Hamilton-12
Jimmy Wales Turns Blind Eye to the Destruction of Neo-Tech by an Obsessive Editor
Wikipedia co-founder Jimmy Wales ignored the biased behavior of an editor named “Bi” who fanatically destroyed Dr. Frank R. Wallace, featured on Wikipedia. Wikipedia editor “Bi” stalked FRW’s page and found excuses to remove positive or even neutral remarks, becoming a much more negative force than a positive or neutral force that Wikipedia editors profess to be. Jimmy Wales knows that an editor with a strong stalker-like obsession can destroy a person’s Wikipedia page. Yet, Wales saw nothing wrong in “Bi’s” extreme bias. Wikipedia resists relatives, friends, and employees from contributing to an article out of concern that the subject would be favored, yet Wales saw no problem with a negative force so strong that it overwhelmed the Neo-Tech and FRW Wikipedia articles with negativity. Why? An idea system such as Neo-Tech exposes the rampant dishonesties in journalists, politicians, the academe, the clergy. So, you can imagine the attacks on Neo-Tech and Neothink in the media and blogosphere.
Indeed, Neo-Tech is a pariah. Neo-Tech, which grew out of Ayn Rand’s Objectivism, pushed the idea of exerting the Objectivist philosophy into dynamic business, going beyond static intellectual gymnastics. (Neothink, which later grew out of Neo-Tech, provides breakthrough value-creation techniques, systems, paradigms.) In the mid-90’s when Objectivists, even the leaders such as Leonard Peikoff and Harry Binswanger, brandished Neo-Tech and its founder as a “bunch of crackpots”, Jimmy Wales himself participated in the Neo-Tech/Objectivist flame wars culminating in the Objectivists setting up a newsgroup that banned Neo-Tech. Wikipedia’s censoring out Neo-Tech and Dr. Frank R. Wallace stems back to those Objectivist/Neo-Tech conflagrations.
Journalists and bloggers especially like to attack Neo-Tech® and Neothink® by criticizing what Neo-Tech/Neothink charge for their expensive Neo-Tech® and Neothink® Manuscripts as though today, to charge money for a value makes the businessman a bad person. Neo-Tech® and Neothink® both expose the criminal mind of those who attack business as something inherently evil. Yet, no journalists actually challenge the Neo-Tech philosophy itself. Moreover, no journalist actually reads Neo-Tech/Neothink! They avoid it because Neo-Tech/Neothink exposes the soul of those who boost their own journalistic careers by attacking business and values. Journalists and bloggers should dare to go beyond their low-effort, safe-and-easy cheap-shot “evil business” attacks on the Neo-Tech/Neothink marketing and pricing and instead put out effort, read Frank R. Wallace’s Neo-Tech Discovery or Mark Hamilton’s Neothink Manuscript, and then let us see what they write about Neo-Tech/Neothink.
Click Here to See Wikipedia vs. Neo-Tech
FOR 10,000 NEOTHINK LETTERS FROM VERY HAPPY LIFETIME CUSTOMERS, CLICK HERE
a con
About Mark Hamilton
aboutmarkhamilton
Alan Grant
Anarky
Anarky series
attack-business journalists
Ayn Rand
Ayn Rand’s Anthem
Ayn Rand’s Objectivism
Batman
cult
DC Comics
Doug Weller
Dr. Frank R. Wallace
Frank R. Wallace/Neo-Tech
FRW
FRW Wikipedia articles
Harry Binswanger
Holy Grail
IMA
Integrated Management Associates, Inc.
Jimmy Wales
Judge Dredd
Leonard Peikoff
Mr. Wales
Neo-Tech Knowledge
Neo-Tech movement
Neo-Tech newsgroup
Neo-Tech philosophy
Neo-Tech Publishing Company
Neo-Tech’s Wikipedia Page
Neo-Tech/Frank R. Wallace
Neo-Tech/Objectivism
Neothink Manuscript
Neothink movement
Neothink scholars
Neothink/Mark Hamilton
non-sequiter
Norm Breyfogle
Objectivism
sock puppet
Twelve Visions Party
Wikipedia
